The unifying theme of these thirteen essays is understanding. The thirteen essays collected here are all, in one way or another, about understanding: What is it? What does it take to have it? What does it presuppose in what. Having Thought. Essays in the metaphysics of mind. John Haugeland harvard university press. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England
|Published (Last):||3 February 2014|
|PDF File Size:||1.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
His classes were challenging and engaging–the quality of teaching in that department was better than the graduate school I attended–and he is a very kind person to boot.
Haugeland sees his task more subtly in a three stage development. Essays in the Thoughg of Mind by John Haugeland. Books by John Haugeland.
Jane Heal – – Cambridge Thojght Press. The thirteen essays collected here are all, in one way or another, about understanding: Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 43 Limited preview – He once turned an old IBM selectric typewriter into a computer printer think about that interface problem!
Systematicity and the Cognition of Structured Domains. The unifying theme of these thirteen essays is understanding. When I explained Haugeland’s theory to a friend, he mentioned that it sounds like the simple schema Great analytic metaphysics that is consistent with theories in embodied cognition.
Having Thought – John Haugeland – Google Books
One of the fascinating things about Haugeland is that his writing style reflects his system theory-inspired philosophy. Finally, the fourth and most recent group of essays confronts the essential character of understanding in relation to what is understood.
Matt rated it liked it Sep 05, What is objective knowledge, and jonh is it possible? In the third set of papers, Haugeland elaborates and then undermines a battery of common presuppositions about the foundational notions of intentionality and representation.
Eliot rated it it was amazing Mar 12, Few if any philosophy books need be read with only one hand, but why should we need three? Want to Read saving…. Mind, Reason and Imagination: If I were to put together a A how to book on A how to do thoought this essay would be one I would dissect at length, revealing its virtues.
Refresh and try again.
In the third set of papers, Haugeland elaborates and then undermines a battery of common presuppositions about the foundational notions of intentionality and representation. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. History of Western Philosophy. Ryan rated it it was amazing Feb 17, Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. I certainly do not deny that language is characteristic of people, and centrally important to what we are.
Thought Experiments in Metaphilosophy. Still, Haugeland is right that the gulf between animal mind and human mind is huge. Intelligibility comes to the fore in a set of “metaphysical” pieces on analog and digital systems and supervenience.
Harvard University Press- Philosophy – pages. Although Haugeland uses games chess and empirical science as the major examples for his theory of objectivity, I wonder how these same theories could be applied to other human practices that have claim to truth faith communities, art movements, etc. Since schema theory applies to experiences of mental illness, I also wonder whether Haugeland’s theory could do the same. It purports to be a revisionist taxonomy of representations, and that it surely is, but its new taxonomy amounts to a strikingly new way of thinking about representations.
For example, see “Mind Embodied and Embedded” and, what’s possibly the most challenging paper in the book, One of the fascinating things about Haugeland thouyht that his writing style reflects his system theory-inspired philosophy.
What does it presuppose in what can be understood? This is a collection of essays, all but two previously published, so the question jlhn be hauyeland A Constituted Domain, and A Objects. Htought especially enjoyed the chapters in the last section of Truth. Here is one point in favor: Request removal from index.
Few topics have been mulled over more than representations in the last half century, and one would think that by now all the major moves had been made, and that it was time for fine tuning. Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Although the quirky problems in characterizing the A essences of these primary genera have long been acknowledged, the canonical wisdom has been that this is not to be done in terms of the content of what they represent, but somehow in their manner or format or system of representing.
Find it on Scholar. Down with A endnotes!