Tracing a journey from the s through the s, N. Katherine Hayles uses three writing machines in depth: Talan Memmott’s groundbreaking electronic. Writing Machines has ratings and 8 reviews. Eric said: Hayles frames Writing Machines as “an experiment in forging a vocabulary and set of critical p. What readers will notice first about Katherine Hayles’s award-winning Writing Machines are the material properties of the book itself. Part of the MIT Mediawork .
|Published (Last):||5 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||8.56 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.24 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Nor is it surprising that one of the key texts it investigates is Tom Phillips’ A Humument , which so strongly recalls illuminated manuscripts. Her chapter on A Humument is the major speedbump: Hayles’ brilliance and enthusiasm carry us through to the end, and even bring us back to poke around in the better passages. She also explores the ways such texts challenge and undermine traditional conceptions of subjectivity.
This website katherinf cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our kathedine.
Most katheine what is happening, and is likely to happen, in electronic literature is dependent on a subtle, para-textual poetics. At times I felt that Hayles thought her ideas were more original than they were though there were a few acknowledgments of the work of bibliographers and book historiansbut she writes well and engagingly about her topic.
Review – Writing Machines – Hayles
Besides making electronic literatures critically legible, it could crucially affect the whole business of literary criticism, to the point of completely changing the way certain canonic writers are interpreted.
While a host of experimental poets and writers on poetics have been daily exploding that view for decades , their work is culturally marginal. If so, she finds herself in a kind of Ancient Mariner scenario — thirsty, but unable to drink from the body of water her ship floats on. On the one hand, the book exploits the resources of print—an interplay between the visual and the textual is achieved by the literal incorporation, rather than mere quotation, of elements of her central texts: Electronic text has its own specificities, and a deep understanding of them would bring into view by contrast the haylez of print, which could again be seen for what it was, a medium, and not a transparent interface.
The author doesn’t just write these points, she also worked with machinee designer to make the book feel more like an experience than a “regular” book and to emphasize her points.
The autobiographical or pseudo-autobiographical narrative components are the most galling aspect of the book. Lyle rated it it was amazing Aug 28, Oct 01, Chris rated it really ktherine it Shelves: Hayles explores works that focus on the very inscription technologies that produce them, examining three writing kayherine in depth: Ashley rated it it was ok Mar 10, Much of that work has been accomplished through experimental poetry and its critics, recently extended into discussion of electronic literature.
As Hayles says in an interview accessible through the MIT web site: University of Chicago Press,pp. Part of the MIT Mediawork series, which features pamphlet-like books with a marked visual component and predetermined constraints notably length and the inclusion of an autobiographical elementWriting Machines is the result of a striking collaboration between Hayles and designer Anne Burdick.
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. She also self-dramatizes her intellectual process to make her not very original theories sound admirably hard-won.
Matherine to Book Page. In Writing MachinesKatherine Hayles argues for understanding materiality as a way to discuss representation and simulation and to explore what texts enable and constrain 6.
What readers will notice first about Katherine Hayles’s award-winning Writing Machines are the material properties of the book itself. She brings together the two worlds of literature and computer wroting.
Project MUSE – Writing Machines (review)
Someone in the chain of command — writer, editor, publisher, friend? Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Difficult reading but definitely worth it. The still evolving general concept of hypertext best defined as: The omission is incomprehensible. Yet Writing Machinespublished inis timely. Indeed, it is impossible to engage Writing Machines without performing a media-specific analysis, which Hayles articulates as an accounting for the physical embodiment of the text and its relation to the content.
She also discusses “House of Leaves” which I have yet to get my hands on and read, but sounds fascinating. Doing so, she betrays that she neither has any skills as a storyteller nor as a creator of modulated narrative prose.
Hayles explores works that focus on the very inscription technologies that produce them, examining three writing machines in depth: Robbe wtiting it really liked it Nov 08, Devon rated it it was amazing Jun 23, Maybe she doesn’t really “get” the poetics of the kinds of work she is approaching; by “get” I mean to grasp intuitively how the work is positioned, which is necessary for writing effective criticism of it.
Christa rated it liked it Jun 03, If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you. Katherine Writibg uses the autobiographical persona of Kaye to explore how literature has transformed Want to Read saving…. MIT Press- Computers – pages. For many reasons, most directly tied to changes in technology, people are looking at print with fresh refreshed? Jachines Califiamoves to cybertext Aarsethand culminates in the “technotext,” Hayles’s term for literary works that self-reflexively engage with their own inscription technologies and integrate semiotic elements such as kineticism and navigational structures.
Katherine Hayles uses the autobiographical persona of Kaye to explore how literature has transformed itself from inscriptions rendered as the flat durable marks of print to th A pseudo-autobiographical exploration of the artistic and cultural impact of the transformation of the print book to its electronic incarnations. She did not see a dial telephone until she left home for college; in Clarence she used the phone by cranking the ringer, whereupon Delores, the town operator, would answer and ask what number she wanted, no doubt continuing to listen in to catch the juicy bits.
Katherine Hayles No preview available – Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Even if Writing Machines is only an incomplete foray into the area, it’s worth reading for the host of useful formulations and valuable information it contains, and for the model it provides of an integrated approach to materially-oriented criticism.
From the start, Hayles omits from her study almost all the valuable work that has already been done on the topic of “media and materiality” in literature. The emergence of electronic literatures in the 20th century and the ever-increasing use of new media in literature means that the acceptance of media and materiality as dimensions kathegine literary meaning is inevitable, no matter how long it has been delayed.